↓ Skip to main content

Should cities hosting mass gatherings invest in public health surveillance and planning? Reflections from a decade of mass gatherings in Sydney, Australia

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, September 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Should cities hosting mass gatherings invest in public health surveillance and planning? Reflections from a decade of mass gatherings in Sydney, Australia
Published in
BMC Public Health, September 2009
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-9-324
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah Thackway, Timothy Churches, Jan Fizzell, David Muscatello, Paul Armstrong

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 97 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 21%
Researcher 19 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Other 8 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Other 20 20%
Unknown 17 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 14%
Social Sciences 7 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 6%
Psychology 4 4%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 19 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2014.
All research outputs
#7,487,068
of 22,886,568 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#7,915
of 14,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,613
of 91,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#18
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,886,568 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,899 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.