↓ Skip to main content

Determining what constitutes an effective psychosocial ‘return to work’ intervention: a systematic review and narrative synthesis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, November 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Determining what constitutes an effective psychosocial ‘return to work’ intervention: a systematic review and narrative synthesis
Published in
BMC Public Health, November 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12889-021-11898-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anthony Venning, Tassia K. Oswald, Jeremy Stevenson, Nicci Tepper, Leva Azadi, Sharon Lawn, Paula Redpath

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Lecturer 3 7%
Student > Master 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 21 51%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 15%
Unspecified 4 10%
Psychology 4 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 23 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2024.
All research outputs
#7,093,722
of 25,661,882 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#7,843
of 17,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,121
of 516,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#151
of 382 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,661,882 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,762 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 516,041 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 382 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.