You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Acceptability and feasibility of malaria prophylaxis for forest goers: findings from a qualitative study in Cambodia
|
---|---|
Published in |
Malaria Journal, November 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12936-021-03983-w |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Monnaphat Jongdeepaisal, Mom Ean, Chhoeun Heng, Thoek Buntau, Rupam Tripura, James J. Callery, Thomas J. Peto, Franca Conradis-Jansen, Lorenz von Seidlein, Panarasri Khonputsa, Kulchada Pongsoipetch, Ung Soviet, Siv Sovannaroth, Christopher Pell, Richard J. Maude |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
Thailand | 1 | 13% |
Switzerland | 1 | 13% |
United States | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
Scientists | 2 | 25% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 10% |
Unspecified | 3 | 8% |
Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
Other | 4 | 10% |
Unknown | 23 | 57% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 15% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 10% |
Unspecified | 3 | 8% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 23 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2021.
All research outputs
#6,809,008
of 24,400,706 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#1,854
of 5,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,214
of 511,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#31
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,400,706 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,827 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 511,003 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.