↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating the usability and acceptability of a geographical information system (GIS) prototype to visualise socio-economic and public health data

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, November 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluating the usability and acceptability of a geographical information system (GIS) prototype to visualise socio-economic and public health data
Published in
BMC Public Health, November 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12889-021-12072-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joshua Wells, Robert Grant, John Chang, Reem Kayyali

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 12%
Researcher 5 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Lecturer 2 5%
Unspecified 2 5%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 20 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 5 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Unspecified 2 5%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 20 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2021.
All research outputs
#18,809,260
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#13,131
of 15,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#365,233
of 510,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#283
of 360 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,198 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 510,347 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 360 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.