↓ Skip to main content

Clinical review: Neuromonitoring - an update

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
212 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical review: Neuromonitoring - an update
Published in
Critical Care, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/cc11513
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nino Stocchetti, Peter Le Roux, Paul Vespa, Mauro Oddo, Giuseppe Citerio, Peter J Andrews, Robert D Stevens, Tarek Sharshar, Fabio S Taccone, Jean-Louis Vincent

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Critically ill patients are frequently at risk of neurological dysfunction as a result of primary neurological conditions or secondary insults. Determining which aspects of brain function are affected and how best to manage the neurological dysfunction can often be difficult and is complicated by the limited information that can be gained from clinical examination in such patients and the effects of therapies, notably sedation, on neurological function. Methods to measure and monitor brain function have evolved considerably in recent years and now play an important role in the evaluation and management of patients with brain injury. Importantly, no single technique is ideal for all patients and different variables will need to be monitored in different patients; in many patients, a combination of monitoring techniques will be needed. Although clinical studies support the physiologic feasibility and biologic plausibility of management based on information from various monitors, data supporting this concept from randomized trials are still required.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 212 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 202 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 33 16%
Researcher 32 15%
Other 20 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 8%
Student > Master 18 8%
Other 55 26%
Unknown 36 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 141 67%
Neuroscience 12 6%
Engineering 4 2%
Computer Science 4 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 1%
Other 9 4%
Unknown 39 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2016.
All research outputs
#14,599,159
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,804
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,018
of 307,792 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#34
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,792 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.