You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Adverse fibrosis remodeling and aortopulmonary collateral flow are associated with poor Fontan outcomes
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, November 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12968-021-00782-9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Andrea Pisesky, Marjolein J. E. Reichert, Charlotte de Lange, Mike Seed, Shi-Joon Yoo, Christopher Z. Lam, Lars Grosse-Wortmann |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 3 | 20% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 20% |
Other | 2 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 4 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 47% |
Computer Science | 1 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 6 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2021.
All research outputs
#16,824,145
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#1,052
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#241,076
of 432,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#30
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,788 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.