↓ Skip to main content

Comparative efficacy and safety of first-line treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with ALK-rearranged: a meta-analysis of clinical trials

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, November 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparative efficacy and safety of first-line treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with ALK-rearranged: a meta-analysis of clinical trials
Published in
BMC Cancer, November 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12885-021-08977-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hao-chuan Ma, Yi-hong Liu, Kai-lin Ding, Yu-feng Liu, Wen-jie Zhao, Yan-juan Zhu, Xue-song Chang, Ya-dong Chen, Zhen-zhen Xiao, Ya-ya Yu, Rui Zhou, Hai-bo Zhang

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Student > Master 1 3%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 21 68%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 20 65%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2021.
All research outputs
#15,686,478
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#4,205
of 8,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#283,977
of 510,399 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#86
of 223 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,441 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 510,399 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 223 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.