You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Targeting screening and treatment for latent tuberculosis infection towards asylum seekers from high-incidence countries – a model-based cost-effectiveness analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, November 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-021-12142-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Florian M. Marx, Barbara Hauer, Nicolas A. Menzies, Walter Haas, Nita Perumal |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 75 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
| Librarian | 3 | 4% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 41 | 55% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 13% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 43 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2021.
All research outputs
#3,705,038
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#4,031
of 15,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,494
of 510,399 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#82
of 363 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,198 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 510,399 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 363 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.