You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
HIV-1 subtype distribution and its demographic determinants in newly diagnosed patients in Europe suggest highly compartmentalized epidemics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Retrovirology, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1742-4690-10-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ana B Abecasis, Annemarie MJ Wensing, Dimitris Paraskevis, Jurgen Vercauteren, Kristof Theys, David AMC Van de Vijver, Jan Albert, Birgitta Asjö, Claudia Balotta, Danail Beshkov, Ricardo J Camacho, Bonaventura Clotet, Cillian De Gascun, Algis Griskevicius, Zehava Grossman, Osamah Hamouda, Andrzej Horban, Tatjana Kolupajeva, Klaus Korn, Leon G Kostrikis, Claudia Kücherer, Kirsi Liitsola, Marek Linka, Claus Nielsen, Dan Otelea, Roger Paredes, Mario Poljak, Elisabeth Puchhammer-Stöckl, Jean-Claude Schmit, Anders Sönnerborg, Danika Stanekova, Maja Stanojevic, Daniel Struck, Charles AB Boucher, Anne-Mieke Vandamme |
| Abstract |
Understanding HIV-1 subtype distribution and epidemiology can assist preventive measures and clinical decisions. Sequence variation may affect antiviral drug resistance development, disease progression, evolutionary rates and transmission routes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 192 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 37 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 16% |
| Researcher | 28 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 20 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 8% |
| Other | 44 | 22% |
| Unknown | 20 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 60 | 30% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 40 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 24 | 12% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 13 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 11% |
| Unknown | 30 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2013.
All research outputs
#16,048,318
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Retrovirology
#758
of 1,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,118
of 292,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Retrovirology
#13
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,273 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,345 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.