↓ Skip to main content

Calcium plus vitamin D3 supplementation facilitated Fat loss in overweight and obese college students with very-low calcium consumption: a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
26 X users
facebook
11 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
246 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Calcium plus vitamin D3 supplementation facilitated Fat loss in overweight and obese college students with very-low calcium consumption: a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Nutrition Journal, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1475-2891-12-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wei Zhu, Donglian Cai, Ying Wang, Ning Lin, Qingqing Hu, Yang Qi, Shuangshuang Ma, Sidath Amarasekara

Abstract

Recent evidence suggests that higher calcium and/or vitamin D intake may be associated with lower body weight and better metabolic health. Due to contradictory findings from intervention trials, we investigated the effect of calcium plus vitamin D3 (calcium+D) supplementation on anthropometric and metabolic profiles during energy restriction in healthy, overweight and obese adults with very-low calcium consumption.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 246 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 240 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 55 22%
Student > Master 39 16%
Researcher 27 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 7%
Student > Postgraduate 15 6%
Other 40 16%
Unknown 52 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 66 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 10%
Sports and Recreations 12 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 4%
Other 32 13%
Unknown 64 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 87. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2024.
All research outputs
#481,379
of 25,113,446 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#151
of 1,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,492
of 294,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#5
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,113,446 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,502 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,992 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.