You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The taxonomic name resolution service: an online tool for automated standardization of plant names
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Bioinformatics, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2105-14-16 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brad Boyle, Nicole Hopkins, Zhenyuan Lu, Juan Antonio Raygoza Garay, Dmitry Mozzherin, Tony Rees, Naim Matasci, Martha L Narro, William H Piel, Sheldon J Mckay, Sonya Lowry, Chris Freeland, Robert K Peet, Brian J Enquist |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 29% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Norway | 1 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 57% |
| Scientists | 4 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 428 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 2% |
| Brazil | 6 | 1% |
| Colombia | 4 | <1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 398 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 87 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 66 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 62 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 47 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 23 | 5% |
| Other | 78 | 18% |
| Unknown | 65 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 191 | 45% |
| Environmental Science | 83 | 19% |
| Computer Science | 24 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 3% |
| Engineering | 14 | 3% |
| Other | 26 | 6% |
| Unknown | 76 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,495,056
of 25,728,350 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#199
of 7,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,201
of 295,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#3
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,350 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,737 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,083 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.