You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Development and validation of microsatellite markers for Brachiaria ruziziensisobtained by partial genome assembly of Illumina single-end reads
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Genomics, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2164-14-17 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pedro IT Silva, Alexandre M Martins, Ediene G Gouvea, Marco Pessoa-Filho, Márcio E Ferreira |
| Abstract |
Brachiaria ruziziensis is one of the most important forage species planted in the tropics. The application of genomic tools to aid the selection of superior genotypes can provide support to B. ruziziensis breeding programs. However, there is a complete lack of information about the B. ruziziensis genome. Also, the availability of genomic tools, such as molecular markers, to support B. ruziziensis breeding programs is rather limited. Recently, next-generation sequencing technologies have been applied to generate sequence data for the identification of microsatellite regions and primer design. In this study, we present a first validated set of SSR markers for Brachiaria ruziziensis, selected from a de novo partial genome assembly of single-end Illumina reads. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 6 | 6% |
| Colombia | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Uruguay | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 90 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 24 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 13 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 76 | 72% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 10% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 2% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 11 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2014.
All research outputs
#7,989,009
of 25,446,666 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#3,488
of 11,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,348
of 293,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#57
of 179 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,446,666 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,268 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,281 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 179 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.