↓ Skip to main content

A young girl with severe polyarteritis nodosa successfully treated with tocilizumab: a case report

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Rheumatology, December 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A young girl with severe polyarteritis nodosa successfully treated with tocilizumab: a case report
Published in
Pediatric Rheumatology, December 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12969-021-00654-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Margaux Boistault, Mireia Lopez Corbeto, Pierre Quartier, Laura Berbel Arcobé, Ariadna Carsi Durall, Florence A. Aeschlimann

Abstract

Childhood Polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) is a systemic vasculitis with necrotizing inflammation of medium- and small-sized arteries. Disease evolution may be severe and refractory to standard treatment including prednisone, azathioprine and cyclophosphamide. We present the case of a young girl with severe PAN resulting in progressive ischemia and necrosis of fingers and toes. Biological work-up revealed increased acute phase reactants and interleukin-6 levels. She was only partially controlled despite high-dose corticosteroids and cyclophosphamide infusions, and eventually achieved rapid improvement and sustained remission on tocilizumab. Further, we review the current evidence of the interleukin-6-inhibitor tocilizumab for the treatment of PAN. Tocilizumab may be an efficient therapeutic option in a subset of treatment-refractory children with PAN.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 2 18%
Other 2 18%
Librarian 1 9%
Unspecified 1 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 45%
Unspecified 1 9%
Unknown 5 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2023.
All research outputs
#7,207,626
of 23,504,445 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Rheumatology
#282
of 725 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,628
of 512,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Rheumatology
#7
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,504,445 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 725 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 512,782 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.