↓ Skip to main content

Clinical and analytical comparison of six Simoa assays for plasma P-tau isoforms P-tau181, P-tau217, and P-tau231

Overview of attention for article published in Alzheimer's Research & Therapy, December 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
24 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
113 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical and analytical comparison of six Simoa assays for plasma P-tau isoforms P-tau181, P-tau217, and P-tau231
Published in
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy, December 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13195-021-00939-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sherif Bayoumy, Inge M. W. Verberk, Ben den Dulk, Zulaiga Hussainali, Marissa Zwan, Wiesje M. van der Flier, Nicholas J. Ashton, Henrik Zetterberg, Kaj Blennow, Jeroen Vanbrabant, Erik Stoops, Eugeen Vanmechelen, Jeffrey L. Dage, Charlotte E. Teunissen

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 116 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 4%
Other 5 4%
Student > Master 5 4%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 56 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 25 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 60 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,511,532
of 25,756,531 outputs
Outputs from Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
#220
of 1,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,949
of 516,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
#9
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,756,531 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,503 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 516,957 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.