↓ Skip to main content

Use and effects of implementation strategies for practice guidelines in nursing: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, December 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
24 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Use and effects of implementation strategies for practice guidelines in nursing: a systematic review
Published in
Implementation Science, December 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13012-021-01165-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christine E. Cassidy, Margaret B. Harrison, Christina Godfrey, Vera Nincic, Paul A. Khan, Patricia Oakley, Amanda Ross-White, Hilary Grantmyre, Ian D. Graham

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 93 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 13%
Researcher 9 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 6%
Other 5 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 41 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 22 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 10%
Unspecified 4 4%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 45 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2022.
All research outputs
#2,694,313
of 25,363,868 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#548
of 1,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,043
of 515,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#11
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,363,868 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,808 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 515,127 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.