↓ Skip to main content

A qualitative interview study exploring pregnant women’s and health professionals’ attitudes to external cephalic version

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A qualitative interview study exploring pregnant women’s and health professionals’ attitudes to external cephalic version
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2393-13-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rebecca Say, Richard Thomson, Stephen Robson, Catherine Exley

Abstract

Women who have a breech presentation at term have to decide whether to attempt external cephalic version (ECV) and how they want to give birth if the baby remains breech, either by planned caesarean section (CS) or vaginal breech birth. The aim of this study was to explore the attitudes of women with a breech presentation and health professionals who manage breech presentation to ECV.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 67 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 18%
Student > Bachelor 10 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 12%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Postgraduate 7 10%
Other 14 21%
Unknown 10 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 18%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Engineering 2 3%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 12 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2013.
All research outputs
#13,859,387
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#2,536
of 4,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,867
of 290,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#57
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,299 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.