↓ Skip to main content

Prohormones for prediction of adverse medical outcome in community-acquired pneumonia and lower respiratory tract infections

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
131 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prohormones for prediction of adverse medical outcome in community-acquired pneumonia and lower respiratory tract infections
Published in
Critical Care, June 2010
DOI 10.1186/cc9055
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philipp Schuetz, Marcel Wolbers, Mirjam Christ-Crain, Robert Thomann, Claudine Falconnier, Isabelle Widmer, Stefanie Neidert, Thomas Fricker, Claudine Blum, Ursula Schild, Nils G Morgenthaler, Ronald Schoenenberger, Christoph Henzen, Thomas Bregenzer, Claus Hoess, Martin Krause, Heiner C Bucher, Werner Zimmerli, Beat Mueller, the ProHOSP Study Group

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
France 2 2%
Germany 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Greece 1 1%
Unknown 91 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Student > Postgraduate 11 11%
Other 10 10%
Student > Master 9 9%
Other 26 26%
Unknown 17 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 60 61%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Psychology 3 3%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 17 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2021.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,396
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,193
of 104,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#21
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,815 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.