The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 98 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Promoting inclusion in clinical trials—a rapid review of the literature and recommendations for action
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trials, December 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13063-021-05849-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Danielle H. Bodicoat, Ash C. Routen, Andrew Willis, Winifred Ekezie, Clare Gillies, Claire Lawson, Thomas Yates, Francesco Zaccardi, Melanie J. Davies, Kamlesh Khunti |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 18 | 18% |
| Australia | 4 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 74 | 76% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 53 | 54% |
| Scientists | 24 | 24% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 17 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 124 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 13% |
| Unknown | 60 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 6% |
| Psychology | 6 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 13% |
| Unknown | 65 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 75. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2024.
All research outputs
#598,988
of 26,317,969 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#82
of 6,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,946
of 528,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#3
of 200 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,317,969 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,658 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 528,893 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 200 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.