↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

Promoting inclusion in clinical trials—a rapid review of the literature and recommendations for action

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, December 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
102 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
Summary News Twitter Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Promoting inclusion in clinical trials—a rapid review of the literature and recommendations for action
Published in
Trials, December 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13063-021-05849-7
Pubmed ID
34863265
Authors

Danielle H. Bodicoat, Ash C. Routen, Andrew Willis, Winifred Ekezie, Clare Gillies, Claire Lawson, Thomas Yates, Francesco Zaccardi, Melanie J. Davies, Kamlesh Khunti

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 102 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 79 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 22%
Unspecified 8 10%
Student > Master 6 8%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Other 4 5%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 28 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 11%
Unspecified 8 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Psychology 2 3%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 33 42%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 74. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2023.
All research outputs
#521,987
of 23,929,753 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#74
of 6,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,501
of 517,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#4
of 198 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,929,753 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,146 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 517,550 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 198 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.

This page is provided by Altmetric.