You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Proliferation zones in the axolotl brain and regeneration of the telencephalon
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neural Development, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1749-8104-8-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Malcolm Maden, Laurie A Manwell, Brandi K Ormerod |
| Abstract |
Although the brains of lower vertebrates are known to exhibit somewhat limited regeneration after incisional or stab wounds, the Urodele brain exhibits extensive regeneration after massive tissue removal. Discovering whether and how neural progenitor cells that reside in the ventricular zones of Urodeles proliferate to mediate tissue repair in response to injury may produce novel leads for regenerative strategies. Here we show that endogenous neural progenitor cells resident to the ventricular zone of Urodeles spontaneously proliferate, producing progeny that migrate throughout the telencephalon before terminally differentiating into neurons. These progenitor cells appear to be responsible for telencephalon regeneration after tissue removal and their activity may be up-regulated by injury through an olfactory cue. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 2 | 9% |
| Poland | 2 | 9% |
| United States | 2 | 9% |
| Paraguay | 1 | 4% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 61% |
| Scientists | 5 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Hungary | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 141 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 16% |
| Researcher | 21 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 10% |
| Unknown | 37 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 35 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 29 | 20% |
| Neuroscience | 21 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 5% |
| Psychology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Unknown | 43 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 362. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2022.
All research outputs
#88,785
of 25,563,770 outputs
Outputs from Neural Development
#2
of 233 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#493
of 293,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neural Development
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,563,770 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 233 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,406 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.