You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Primary Immunodeficiencies (PID): driving diagnosis for optimal care in Europe
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, October 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1750-1172-5-s1-p10 |
| Authors |
Marta Czerniawska, Fred Modell |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 1 | 20% |
| Other | 1 | 20% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 20% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2021.
All research outputs
#2,441,155
of 22,641,687 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#309
of 2,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,868
of 99,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,641,687 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,590 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,111 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.