You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Predicting feeding-tube dependence in patients following endotracheal extubation: a two-item swallowing screen
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Pulmonary Medicine, December 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12890-021-01771-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shu-Fen Siao, Wen-Hsuan Tseng, Tyng-Guey Wang, Yu-Chung Wei, Tzu-Yu Hsiao, Shih-Chi Ku, Cheryl Chia-Hui Chen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Saudi Arabia | 3 | 50% |
| Kuwait | 1 | 17% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 62 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 13% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 29 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 24% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 30 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2022.
All research outputs
#3,102,549
of 22,818,766 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#214
of 1,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,638
of 499,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#12
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,818,766 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,913 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 499,969 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.