You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Visual field defects of optic neuritis in neuromyelitis optica compared with multiple sclerosis
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Neurology, June 2010
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2377-10-45 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hideto Nakajima, Takafumi Hosokawa, Masakazu Sugino, Fumiharu Kimura, Jun Sugasawa, Toshiaki Hanafusa, Toshiyuki Takahashi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Korea, Republic of | 2 | 2% |
Israel | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 82 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 14% |
Researcher | 11 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 13% |
Other | 9 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 9% |
Other | 24 | 28% |
Unknown | 10 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 51% |
Neuroscience | 8 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
Other | 8 | 9% |
Unknown | 15 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2012.
All research outputs
#7,656,930
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neurology
#874
of 2,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,051
of 95,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neurology
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,487 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,140 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.