You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
No role for quality scores in systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, May 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2288-5-19 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Penny Whiting, Roger Harbord, Jos Kleijnen |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 141 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 27 | 18% |
| Researcher | 19 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 11% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 8% |
| Other | 44 | 29% |
| Unknown | 19 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 74 | 49% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 12% |
| Psychology | 7 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 18 | 12% |
| Unknown | 24 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2021.
All research outputs
#19,171,898
of 23,758,334 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,808
of 2,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,439
of 58,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,758,334 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,100 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,702 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.