You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Harnessing technology to enable all women mobility in labour and birth: feasibility of implementing beltless non-invasive fetal ECG applying the NASSS framework
|
---|---|
Published in |
Pilot and Feasibility Studies, December 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40814-021-00953-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Deborah Fox, Rebecca Coddington, Vanessa Scarf, Andrew Bisits, Anne Lainchbury, Rachael Woodworth, Robyn Maude, Maralyn Foureur, Jane Sandall |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 2 | 29% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
New Zealand | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 43% |
Scientists | 3 | 43% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
Researcher | 3 | 8% |
Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
Other | 6 | 17% |
Unknown | 16 | 44% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 14% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 11% |
Engineering | 3 | 8% |
Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Unknown | 17 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2021.
All research outputs
#6,991,232
of 25,270,999 outputs
Outputs from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#441
of 1,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,271
of 517,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#11
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,270,999 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,216 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 517,498 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.