You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Correction to: Phenotype, genotype and long-term prognosis of 40 Chinese patients with isobutyryl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency and a review of variant spectra in ACAD8
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, December 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13023-021-02132-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Junqi Feng, Chenxi Yang, Ling Zhu, Yuchen Zhang, Xiaoxu Zhao, Chi Chen, Qi-xing Chen, Qiang Shu, Pingping Jiang, Fan Tong |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2021.
All research outputs
#19,542,561
of 24,040,389 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#2,263
of 2,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#374,387
of 506,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#70
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,040,389 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,812 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 506,640 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.