You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Classification of videocapsule endoscopy image patterns: comparative analysis between patients with celiac disease and normal individuals
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BioMedical Engineering OnLine, September 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-925x-9-44 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Edward J Ciaccio, Christina A Tennyson, Govind Bhagat, Suzanne K Lewis, Peter HR Green |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Greece | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 41 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 14% |
| Researcher | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 33% |
| Unknown | 8 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 28% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 19% |
| Engineering | 5 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 9 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2011.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BioMedical Engineering OnLine
#238
of 867 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,602
of 104,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioMedical Engineering OnLine
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 867 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,672 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.