You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Feasibility and acceptability of transcranial stimulation in obsessive–compulsive symptoms (FEATSOCS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Pilot and Feasibility Studies, December 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40814-021-00945-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Eduardo Cinosi, David Adam, Ibrahim Aslan, David Baldwin, Kieran Chillingsworth, Arun Enara, Tim Gale, Kabir Garg, Matthew Garner, Robert Gordon, Natalie Hall, Nathan T. M. Huneke, Sonay Kucukterzi-Ali, Joanne McCarthy, Daniel Meron, Deela Monji-Patel, Roisin Mooney, Trevor Robbins, Megan Smith, Nick Sireau, David Wellsted, Solange Wyatt, Naomi A. Fineberg |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
Researcher | 2 | 6% |
Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 18 | 58% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Neuroscience | 6 | 19% |
Psychology | 4 | 13% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 3% |
Engineering | 1 | 3% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 18 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2021.
All research outputs
#17,656,184
of 22,663,969 outputs
Outputs from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#784
of 1,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#333,725
of 495,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#23
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,020 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 495,758 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.