You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Application of the screening and indirect cohort methods to evaluate the effectiveness of pneumococcal vaccination program in adults 75 years and older in Taiwan
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Infectious Diseases, January 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12879-020-05721-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Wei-Ju Su, Pei-Hung Chuang, Luan-Yin Chang, Hsiu-Yun Lo, Chuen-Sheue Chiang, Ez-Tzu Wang, Chin-Hui Yang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 5 | 22% |
Researcher | 4 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 11 | 48% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 26% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 9% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 4% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 4% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 12 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2021.
All research outputs
#7,656,930
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#2,630
of 7,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,952
of 502,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#58
of 163 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,804 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 502,757 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 163 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.