You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Cardiac and hepatic iron and ejection fraction in thalassemia major: Multicentre prospective comparison of combined Deferiprone and Deferoxamine therapy against Deferiprone or Deferoxamine Monotherapy
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, January 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1532-429x-15-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Alessia Pepe, Antonella Meloni, Giuseppe Rossi, Liana Cuccia, Giuseppe Domenico D’Ascola, Michele Santodirocco, Paolo Cianciulli, Vincenzo Caruso, Maria Antonietta Romeo, Aldo Filosa, Lorella Pitrolo, Maria Caterina Putti, Angelo Peluso, Saveria Campisi, Massimiliano Missere, Massimo Midiri, Letizia Gulino, Vincenzo Positano, Massimo Lombardi, Paolo Ricchi |
Abstract |
Due to the limited data available in literature, the aim of this multi-centre study was to prospectively compare in thalassemia major (TM) patients the efficacy of combined deferiprone (DFP) and deferoxamine (DFO) regimen versus either DFP and DFO in monotherapy by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) over a follow up of 18 months. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Indonesia | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 44 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 8 | 18% |
Researcher | 6 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 11% |
Lecturer | 2 | 4% |
Other | 8 | 18% |
Unknown | 11 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 53% |
Engineering | 3 | 7% |
Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 4% |
Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Unknown | 11 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2018.
All research outputs
#8,320,761
of 25,522,520 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#673
of 1,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,164
of 293,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#4
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,522,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,608 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.