↓ Skip to main content

Cardiac and hepatic iron and ejection fraction in thalassemia major: Multicentre prospective comparison of combined Deferiprone and Deferoxamine therapy against Deferiprone or Deferoxamine Monotherapy

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (Taylor & Francis Ltd), January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
108 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cardiac and hepatic iron and ejection fraction in thalassemia major: Multicentre prospective comparison of combined Deferiprone and Deferoxamine therapy against Deferiprone or Deferoxamine Monotherapy
Published in
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (Taylor & Francis Ltd), January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1532-429x-15-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alessia Pepe, Antonella Meloni, Giuseppe Rossi, Liana Cuccia, Giuseppe Domenico D’Ascola, Michele Santodirocco, Paolo Cianciulli, Vincenzo Caruso, Maria Antonietta Romeo, Aldo Filosa, Lorella Pitrolo, Maria Caterina Putti, Angelo Peluso, Saveria Campisi, Massimiliano Missere, Massimo Midiri, Letizia Gulino, Vincenzo Positano, Massimo Lombardi, Paolo Ricchi

Abstract

Due to the limited data available in literature, the aim of this multi-centre study was to prospectively compare in thalassemia major (TM) patients the efficacy of combined deferiprone (DFP) and deferoxamine (DFO) regimen versus either DFP and DFO in monotherapy by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) over a follow up of 18 months.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 2%
Unknown 41 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 8 19%
Researcher 6 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 12%
Lecturer 2 5%
Other 9 21%
Unknown 7 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 57%
Engineering 3 7%
Physics and Astronomy 2 5%
Computer Science 1 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 7 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2013.
All research outputs
#2,898,159
of 3,632,582 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (Taylor & Francis Ltd)
#182
of 299 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,731
of 280,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (Taylor & Francis Ltd)
#16
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 3,632,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 299 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,567 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.