↓ Skip to main content

Vitamin D accelerates clinical recovery from tuberculosis: results of the SUCCINCT Study [Supplementary Cholecalciferol in recovery from tuberculosis]. A randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical…

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
26 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
176 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
272 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Vitamin D accelerates clinical recovery from tuberculosis: results of the SUCCINCT Study [Supplementary Cholecalciferol in recovery from tuberculosis]. A randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trial of vitamin D supplementation in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis’
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-13-22
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nawal Salahuddin, Farheen Ali, Zahra Hasan, Nisar Rao, Masooma Aqeel, Faisal Mahmood

Abstract

Vitamin D enhances host protective immune responses to Mycobacterium tuberculosis by suppressing Interferon-gamma (IFN-g) and reducing disease associated inflammation in the host. The objectives of this study were to determine whether vitamin D supplementation to patients with tuberculosis (TB) could influence recovery.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 272 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 264 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 47 17%
Student > Bachelor 38 14%
Researcher 26 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 9%
Other 20 7%
Other 60 22%
Unknown 57 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 101 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 13 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 4%
Other 45 17%
Unknown 63 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2015.
All research outputs
#2,281,068
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#645
of 8,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,907
of 294,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#7
of 172 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,668 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,967 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 172 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.