You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Study protocol: systematic review of the burden of heart failure in low- and middle-income countries
|
---|---|
Published in |
Systematic Reviews, November 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/2046-4053-1-59 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Derrick A Bennett, Thomas K Eliasz, Anna Forbes, Alastair Kiszely, Rajit Khosla, Tatjana Petrinic, Devarsetty Praveen, Roohi Shrivastava, Du Xin, Anushka Patel, Stephen MacMahon, Kazem Rahimi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 46 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 8 | 17% |
Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
Other | 9 | 19% |
Unknown | 12 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 38% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
Other | 7 | 15% |
Unknown | 14 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2013.
All research outputs
#15,261,106
of 22,693,205 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#1,579
of 1,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,856
of 277,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#13
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,693,205 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,982 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,041 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.