↓ Skip to main content

Effect of malaria on HIV/AIDS transmission and progression

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
59 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
92 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
232 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of malaria on HIV/AIDS transmission and progression
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1756-3305-6-18
Pubmed ID
Authors

Abebe Alemu, Yitayal Shiferaw, Zelalem Addis, Biniam Mathewos, Wubet Birhan

Abstract

Malaria and HIV are among the two most important global health problems of developing countries. They cause more than 4 million deaths a year. These two infections interact bidirectionally and synergistically with each other. HIV infection increases the risk of an increase in the severity of malaria infection and burdens of malaria, which in turn facilitates the rate of malaria transmission. Malaria infection is also associated with strong CD4+ cell activation and up-regulation of proinflammatory cytokines and it provides an ideal microenvironment for the spread of the virus among the CD4+ cells and for rapid HIV-1 replication. Additionally, malaria increases blood viral burden by different mechanisms. Therefore, high concentrations of HIV-1 RNA in the blood are predictive of disease progression, and correlate with the risk of blood-borne, vertical, and sexual transmission of the virus. Therefore, this article aims to review information about HIV malaria interactions, the effect of malaria on HIV transmission and progression and the implications related to prevention and treatment of coinfection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 232 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Nigeria 2 <1%
Sierra Leone 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 224 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 41 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 16%
Researcher 29 13%
Student > Bachelor 19 8%
Student > Postgraduate 15 6%
Other 36 16%
Unknown 55 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 4%
Other 35 15%
Unknown 65 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2020.
All research outputs
#917,599
of 25,736,439 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#107
of 6,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,316
of 294,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#2
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,736,439 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,077 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,653 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.