↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of Pilates exercise in treating people with chronic low back pain: a systematic review of systematic reviews

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
45 X users
facebook
8 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
308 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effectiveness of Pilates exercise in treating people with chronic low back pain: a systematic review of systematic reviews
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-13-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cherie Wells, Gregory S Kolt, Paul Marshall, Bridget Hill, Andrea Bialocerkowski

Abstract

Systematic reviews provide clinical practice recommendations that are based on evaluation of primary evidence. When systematic reviews with the same aims have different conclusions, it is difficult to ascertain which review reported the most credible and robust findings.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 308 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 5 2%
Spain 3 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 297 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 63 20%
Student > Bachelor 50 16%
Student > Postgraduate 35 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 6%
Other 61 20%
Unknown 53 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 108 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 54 18%
Sports and Recreations 37 12%
Social Sciences 10 3%
Psychology 6 2%
Other 30 10%
Unknown 63 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2018.
All research outputs
#1,044,935
of 25,392,205 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#104
of 2,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,659
of 290,910 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#2
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,205 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,267 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,910 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.