You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Increased risk of type I errors in cluster randomised trials with small or medium numbers of clusters: a review, reanalysis, and simulation study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trials, September 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13063-016-1571-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brennan C. Kahan, Gordon Forbes, Yunus Ali, Vipul Jairath, Stephen Bremner, Michael O. Harhay, Richard Hooper, Neil Wright, Sandra M. Eldridge, Clémence Leyrat |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 53% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 7% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 3 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 60% |
| Scientists | 4 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 30% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 20% |
| Unknown | 7 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 26% |
| Mathematics | 10 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 10 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2021.
All research outputs
#3,830,581
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#34
of 45 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,877
of 347,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#19
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 45 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one scored the same or higher as 11 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.