↓ Skip to main content

Approximate parameter inference in systems biology using gradient matching: a comparative evaluation

Overview of attention for article published in BioMedical Engineering OnLine, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Approximate parameter inference in systems biology using gradient matching: a comparative evaluation
Published in
BioMedical Engineering OnLine, July 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12938-016-0186-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Benn Macdonald, Mu Niu, Simon Rogers, Maurizio Filippone, Dirk Husmeier

Abstract

A challenging problem in current systems biology is that of parameter inference in biological pathways expressed as coupled ordinary differential equations (ODEs). Conventional methods that repeatedly numerically solve the ODEs have large associated computational costs. Aimed at reducing this cost, new concepts using gradient matching have been proposed, which bypass the need for numerical integration. This paper presents a recently established adaptive gradient matching approach, using Gaussian processes (GPs), combined with a parallel tempering scheme, and conducts a comparative evaluation with current state-of-the-art methods used for parameter inference in ODEs. Among these contemporary methods is a technique based on reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces (RKHS). This has previously shown promising results for parameter estimation, but under lax experimental settings. We look at a range of scenarios to test the robustness of this method. We also change the approach of inferring the penalty parameter from AIC to cross validation to improve the stability of the method. Methodology for the recently proposed adaptive gradient matching method using GPs, upon which we build our new method, is provided. Details of a competing method using RKHS are also described here. We conduct a comparative analysis for the methods described in this paper, using two benchmark ODE systems. The analyses are repeated under different experimental settings, to observe the sensitivity of the techniques. Our study reveals that for known noise variance, our proposed method based on GPs and parallel tempering achieves overall the best performance. When the noise variance is unknown, the RKHS method proves to be more robust.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 20%
Researcher 2 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 10%
Student > Master 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Unknown 1 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 3 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 20%
Arts and Humanities 1 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 10%
Social Sciences 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 20%