↓ Skip to main content

GnRH agonist versus GnRH antagonist in assisted reproduction cycles: oocyte morphology

Overview of attention for article published in Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
GnRH agonist versus GnRH antagonist in assisted reproduction cycles: oocyte morphology
Published in
Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, April 2012
DOI 10.1186/1477-7827-10-33
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ana Marcia M Cota, Joao Batista A Oliveira, Claudia G Petersen, Ana L Mauri, Fabiana C Massaro, Liliane FI Silva, Andreia Nicoletti, Mario Cavagna, Ricardo LR Baruffi, José G Franco

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Russia 1 2%
Nigeria 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 49 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 15%
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Other 4 8%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 12 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 10%
Unspecified 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 13 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2013.
All research outputs
#7,656,930
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology
#294
of 1,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,790
of 164,681 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,002 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,681 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.