↓ Skip to main content

Cardiac tumors: echo assessment

Overview of attention for article published in Echo Research & Practice, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 274)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
143 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
126 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cardiac tumors: echo assessment
Published in
Echo Research & Practice, December 2016
DOI 10.1530/erp-16-0035
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rekha Mankad, Joerg Herrmann

Abstract

Cardiac tumors are exceedingly rare (0.001-0.03% in most autopsy series). They can present anywhere within the heart and can be attached to any surface or be embedded in the myocardium or pericardial space. Signs and symptoms are non-specific and highly variable, related to the localization, size, and composition of the cardiac mass. Echocardiography, typically ordered for another indication, may be the first imaging modality alerting the clinician to the presence of a cardiac mass. Although echocardiography cannot give histopathology, certain imaging features and adjunctive tools such as contrast imaging may aid in the differential diagnosis as do adjunctive clinical data and the following principles: 1) thrombus or vegetations are the most likely etiology, 2) cardiac tumors are mostly secondary, and 3) primary cardiac tumors are mostly benign. While the finding of a cardiac mass on echocardiography may generate confusion, a stepwise approach may serve well practically. Herein we will review such an approach and the role of therein: echocardiography for the assessment of cardiac masses.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 143 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 150 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 18 12%
Other 17 11%
Student > Bachelor 17 11%
Researcher 14 9%
Student > Master 9 6%
Other 25 17%
Unknown 51 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 83 55%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Engineering 2 1%
Sports and Recreations 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 56 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 89. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2024.
All research outputs
#491,093
of 25,848,962 outputs
Outputs from Echo Research & Practice
#4
of 274 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,893
of 419,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Echo Research & Practice
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,848,962 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 274 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 419,260 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them