You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mobile technology supporting trainee doctors’ workplace learning and patient care: an evaluation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Education, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6920-13-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wendy Hardyman, Alison Bullock, Alice Brown, Sophie Carter-Ingram, Mark Stacey |
| Abstract |
The amount of information needed by doctors has exploded. The nature of knowledge (explicit and tacit) and processes of knowledge acquisition and participation are complex. Aiming to assist workplace learning, Wales Deanery funded "iDoc", a project offering trainee doctors a Smartphone library of medical textbooks. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 14 | 31% |
| United States | 4 | 9% |
| Mexico | 3 | 7% |
| Australia | 2 | 4% |
| India | 2 | 4% |
| Spain | 2 | 4% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Hungary | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 14 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 30 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 20% |
| Scientists | 3 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 293 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 1% |
| United States | 4 | 1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 277 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 59 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 12% |
| Researcher | 28 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 25 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 7% |
| Other | 74 | 25% |
| Unknown | 53 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 83 | 28% |
| Social Sciences | 51 | 17% |
| Computer Science | 23 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 15 | 5% |
| Other | 44 | 15% |
| Unknown | 57 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2014.
All research outputs
#1,327,201
of 25,736,439 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#122
of 4,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,500
of 289,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#2
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,736,439 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,050 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,127 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.