You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
CD163 versus CD68 in tumor associated macrophages of classical hodgkin lymphoma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Diagnostic Pathology, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1746-1596-7-12 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jonathan A Harris, Salvia Jain, Qinghu Ren, Alirezah Zarineh, Cynthia Liu, Sherif Ibrahim |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 83 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 10% |
| Other | 17 | 20% |
| Unknown | 9 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 37% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 17% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 11 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2021.
All research outputs
#14,786,093
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from Diagnostic Pathology
#491
of 1,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,630
of 247,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diagnostic Pathology
#6
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,193 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.