You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Local level epidemiological analysis of TB in people from a high incidence country of birth
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, January 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-62 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Peter D Massey, David N Durrheim, Nicola Stephens, Amanda Christensen |
Abstract |
The setting for this analysis is the low tuberculosis (TB) incidence state of New South Wales (NSW), Australia. Local level analysis of TB epidemiology in people from high incidence countries-of-birth (HIC) in a low incidence setting has not been conducted in Australia and has not been widely reported. Local level analysis could inform measures such as active case finding and targeted earlier diagnosis. The aim of this study was to use a novel approach to identify local areas in an Australian state that have higher TB rates given the local areas' country of birth profiles. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 50% |
South Africa | 1 | 25% |
Australia | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 14% |
Other | 3 | 14% |
Student > Master | 2 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 9% |
Other | 4 | 18% |
Unknown | 4 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 55% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 5% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 5 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2013.
All research outputs
#13,028,542
of 22,693,205 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#9,078
of 14,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,327
of 279,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#169
of 273 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,693,205 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,767 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 273 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.