↓ Skip to main content

Prevalence and incidence of chronic wounds and related complications: a protocol for a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#38 of 2,251)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
15 news outlets
twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
280 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
809 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prevalence and incidence of chronic wounds and related complications: a protocol for a systematic review
Published in
Systematic Reviews, September 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13643-016-0329-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Krister Järbrink, Gao Ni, Henrik Sönnergren, Artur Schmidtchen, Caroline Pang, Ram Bajpai, Josip Car

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 809 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 807 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 118 15%
Student > Master 98 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 76 9%
Researcher 51 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 37 5%
Other 115 14%
Unknown 314 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 100 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 74 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 71 9%
Engineering 44 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 41 5%
Other 142 18%
Unknown 337 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 108. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2023.
All research outputs
#394,964
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#38
of 2,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,518
of 348,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#2
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,251 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,043 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.