You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prevalence and incidence of chronic wounds and related complications: a protocol for a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, September 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-016-0329-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Krister Järbrink, Gao Ni, Henrik Sönnergren, Artur Schmidtchen, Caroline Pang, Ram Bajpai, Josip Car |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Canada | 1 | 10% |
| Comoros | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 7 | 70% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
| Scientists | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 824 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 822 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 120 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 99 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 76 | 9% |
| Researcher | 52 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 37 | 4% |
| Other | 114 | 14% |
| Unknown | 326 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 101 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 74 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 72 | 9% |
| Engineering | 45 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 41 | 5% |
| Other | 141 | 17% |
| Unknown | 350 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 109. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2024.
All research outputs
#395,124
of 25,886,866 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#35
of 2,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,442
of 344,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#3
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,886,866 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,265 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,563 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.