↓ Skip to main content

The Physical Activity Messaging Framework (PAMF) and Checklist (PAMC): International consensus statement and user guide

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, December 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
102 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Physical Activity Messaging Framework (PAMF) and Checklist (PAMC): International consensus statement and user guide
Published in
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, December 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12966-021-01230-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chloë Williamson, Graham Baker, Jennifer R. Tomasone, Adrian Bauman, Nanette Mutrie, Ailsa Niven, Justin Richards, Adewale Oyeyemi, Beelin Baxter, Benjamin Rigby, Benny Cullen, Brendan Paddy, Brett Smith, Charlie Foster, Clare Drummy, Corneel Vandelanotte, Emily Oliver, Fatwa Sari Tetra Dewi, Fran McEwen, Frances Bain, Guy Faulkner, Hamish McEwen, Hayley Mills, Jack Brazier, James Nobles, Jennifer Hall, Kaleigh Maclaren, Karen Milton, Kate Olscamp, Lisseth Villalobos Campos, Louise Bursle, Marie Murphy, Nick Cavill, Nora J. Johnston, Paul McCrorie, Rakhmat Ari Wibowo, Rebecca Bassett-Gunter, Rebecca Jones, Sarah Ruane, Trevor Shilton, Paul Kelly

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 102 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 14%
Researcher 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 5%
Student > Master 3 5%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 26 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 8 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 10%
Social Sciences 4 7%
Psychology 4 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 28 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 74. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2023.
All research outputs
#582,431
of 25,490,562 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#166
of 2,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,881
of 513,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#5
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,490,562 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,123 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 513,137 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.