↓ Skip to main content

Partnership for fragility bone fracture care provision and prevention program (P4Bones): study protocol for a secondary fracture prevention pragmatic controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
254 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Partnership for fragility bone fracture care provision and prevention program (P4Bones): study protocol for a secondary fracture prevention pragmatic controlled trial
Published in
Implementation Science, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-8-10
Pubmed ID
Authors

Isabelle Gaboury, Hélène Corriveau, Gilles Boire, François Cabana, Marie-Claude Beaulieu, Pierre Dagenais, Suzanne Gosselin, Earl Bogoch, Marie Rochette, Johanne Filiatrault, Sophie Laforest, Sonia Jean, Alvine Fansi, Diane Theriault, Bernard Burnand

Abstract

Fractures associated with bone fragility in older adults signal the potential for secondary fracture. Fragility fractures often precipitate further decline in health and loss of mobility, with high associated costs for patients, families, society and the healthcare system. Promptly initiating a coordinated, comprehensive pharmacological bone health and falls prevention program post-fracture may improve osteoporosis treatment compliance; and reduce rates of falls and secondary fractures, and associated morbidity, mortality and costs.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 254 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 251 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 48 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 13%
Researcher 29 11%
Student > Bachelor 26 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 7%
Other 35 14%
Unknown 65 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 41 16%
Social Sciences 18 7%
Psychology 11 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 3%
Other 40 16%
Unknown 82 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2013.
All research outputs
#12,132,669
of 21,342,999 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,319
of 1,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,411
of 277,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,342,999 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,682 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,775 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them