↓ Skip to main content

Partnership for fragility bone fracture care provision and prevention program (P4Bones): study protocol for a secondary fracture prevention pragmatic controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
239 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Partnership for fragility bone fracture care provision and prevention program (P4Bones): study protocol for a secondary fracture prevention pragmatic controlled trial
Published in
Implementation Science, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-8-10
Pubmed ID
Authors

Isabelle Gaboury, Hélène Corriveau, Gilles Boire, François Cabana, Marie-Claude Beaulieu, Pierre Dagenais, Suzanne Gosselin, Earl Bogoch, Marie Rochette, Johanne Filiatrault, Sophie Laforest, Sonia Jean, Alvine Fansi, Diane Theriault, Bernard Burnand

Abstract

Fractures associated with bone fragility in older adults signal the potential for secondary fracture. Fragility fractures often precipitate further decline in health and loss of mobility, with high associated costs for patients, families, society and the healthcare system. Promptly initiating a coordinated, comprehensive pharmacological bone health and falls prevention program post-fracture may improve osteoporosis treatment compliance; and reduce rates of falls and secondary fractures, and associated morbidity, mortality and costs.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 239 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 236 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 48 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 14%
Researcher 26 11%
Student > Bachelor 26 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 7%
Other 31 13%
Unknown 59 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 39 16%
Social Sciences 19 8%
Psychology 11 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 3%
Other 37 15%
Unknown 73 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2013.
All research outputs
#6,255,739
of 11,874,992 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#976
of 1,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,432
of 305,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#27
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,874,992 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,257 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,131 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.