You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Partnership for fragility bone fracture care provision and prevention program (P4Bones): study protocol for a secondary fracture prevention pragmatic controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-8-10 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Isabelle Gaboury, Hélène Corriveau, Gilles Boire, François Cabana, Marie-Claude Beaulieu, Pierre Dagenais, Suzanne Gosselin, Earl Bogoch, Marie Rochette, Johanne Filiatrault, Sophie Laforest, Sonia Jean, Alvine Fansi, Diane Theriault, Bernard Burnand |
| Abstract |
Fractures associated with bone fragility in older adults signal the potential for secondary fracture. Fragility fractures often precipitate further decline in health and loss of mobility, with high associated costs for patients, families, society and the healthcare system. Promptly initiating a coordinated, comprehensive pharmacological bone health and falls prevention program post-fracture may improve osteoporosis treatment compliance; and reduce rates of falls and secondary fractures, and associated morbidity, mortality and costs. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 266 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 263 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 49 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 12% |
| Researcher | 30 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 7% |
| Other | 36 | 14% |
| Unknown | 71 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 56 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 41 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 20 | 8% |
| Psychology | 11 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 40 | 15% |
| Unknown | 89 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2013.
All research outputs
#12,868,348
of 22,693,205 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,332
of 1,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,282
of 280,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#23
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,693,205 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,719 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,568 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.