You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The influenza A (H1N1) pandemic in Reunion Island: knowledge, perceived risk and precautionary behaviour
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Infectious Diseases, January 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2334-13-34 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
François Taglioni, Michel Cartoux, Koussay Dellagi, Cécile Dalban, Adrian Fianu, Fabrice Carrat, François Favier |
Abstract |
The effectiveness of preventive measures depends on prevailing attitudes and mindsets within a population. Perceived risk is central to a shift in mindset and behaviour. The present study aims to investigate the perceived severity, vulnerability and precautionary behaviour adopted in response to the influenza A (H1N1) epidemic that broke out in 2009 on Reunion Island (Indian Ocean). As no H1N1 vaccination was available at the time, non-medical interventions appeared of crucial importance to the control of the epidemic. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 129 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 18 | 14% |
Student > Master | 17 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 17 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 11% |
Other | 6 | 5% |
Other | 24 | 18% |
Unknown | 36 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 19% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 11% |
Psychology | 11 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 10 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 5% |
Other | 24 | 18% |
Unknown | 42 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2014.
All research outputs
#12,868,348
of 22,693,205 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#2,976
of 7,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,282
of 280,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#52
of 173 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,693,205 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,644 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,568 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 173 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.