You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Continuous decoding of grasping tasks for a prospective implantable cortical neuroprosthesis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1743-0003-9-84 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jacopo Carpaneto, Vassilis Raos, Maria A Umiltà, Leonardo Fogassi, Akira Murata, Vittorio Gallese, Silvestro Micera |
| Abstract |
In the recent past several invasive cortical neuroprostheses have been developed. Signals recorded from the motor cortex (area MI) have been decoded and used to control computer cursors and robotic devices. Nevertheless, few attempts have been carried out to predict different grips.A Support Vector Machines (SVMs) classifier has been trained for a continuous decoding of four/six grip types using signals recorded in two monkeys from motor neurons of the ventral premotor cortex (area F5) during a reach-to-grasp task. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 44 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 17% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Unknown | 6 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 15 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 17% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 10% |
| Psychology | 4 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Unknown | 6 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2013.
All research outputs
#17,676,164
of 22,693,205 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#934
of 1,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#207,137
of 276,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#25
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,693,205 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,277 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,888 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.