↓ Skip to main content

Development of mental health quality indicators (MHQIs) for inpatient psychiatry based on the interRAI mental health assessment

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development of mental health quality indicators (MHQIs) for inpatient psychiatry based on the interRAI mental health assessment
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-13-15
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher M Perlman, John P Hirdes, Howard Barbaree, Brant E Fries, Ian McKillop, John N Morris, Terry Rabinowitz

Abstract

Outcome quality indicators are rarely used to evaluate mental health services because most jurisdictions lack clinical data systems to construct indicators in a meaningful way across mental health providers. As a result, important information about the effectiveness of health services remains unknown. This study examined the feasibility of developing mental health quality indicators (MHQIs) using the Resident Assessment Instrument - Mental Health (RAI-MH), a clinical assessment system mandated for use in Ontario, Canada as well as many other jurisdictions internationally.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 106 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 17%
Student > Master 19 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 20 18%
Unknown 24 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 11%
Psychology 12 11%
Social Sciences 7 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 34 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2013.
All research outputs
#16,769,630
of 24,666,614 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#6,118
of 8,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,792
of 292,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#87
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,666,614 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,342 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,708 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.