You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Carbon nanotube biocompatibility in plants is determined by their surface chemistry
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, December 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12951-021-01178-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eduardo González-Grandío, Gözde S. Demirer, Christopher T. Jackson, Darwin Yang, Sophia Ebert, Kian Molawi, Harald Keller, Markita P. Landry |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 13% |
| Researcher | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 22 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 15% |
| Engineering | 5 | 11% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 4% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 24 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2021.
All research outputs
#14,190,698
of 22,745,803 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#504
of 1,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#236,651
of 495,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#42
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,745,803 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,398 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 495,492 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.