You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Intensified secondary prevention intending a reduction of recurrent events in TIA and minor stroke patients (INSPiRE-TMS): a protocol for a randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Neurology, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2377-13-11 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stefanie Leistner, Georg Michelson, Inga Laumeier, Michael Ahmadi, Maureen Smyth, Gabriele Nieweler, Wolfram Doehner, Jan Sobesky, Jochen B Fiebach, Peter Marx, Otto Busse, Friedrich Köhler, Holger Poppert, Martin LJ Wimmer, Thomas Knoll, Paul Von Weitzel-Mudersbach, Heinrich J Audebert |
| Abstract |
Patients with recent stroke or TIA are at high risk for new vascular events. Several evidence based strategies in secondary prevention of stroke are available but frequently underused. Support programs with multifactorial risk factor modifications after stroke or TIA have not been investigated in large-scale prospective controlled trials so far. INSPiRE-TMS is a prospective, multi-center, randomized open intervention trial for intensified secondary prevention after minor stroke and TIA. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Egypt | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 168 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 24 | 14% |
| Researcher | 22 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 40 | 23% |
| Unknown | 44 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 63 | 37% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 12% |
| Psychology | 12 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 9% |
| Unknown | 47 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2013.
All research outputs
#15,261,106
of 22,693,205 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neurology
#1,478
of 2,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,789
of 280,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neurology
#22
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,693,205 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,568 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.