↓ Skip to main content

Inhibition of neutrophil elastase attenuates airway hyperresponsiveness and inflammation in a mouse model of secondary allergen challenge: neutrophil elastase inhibition attenuates allergic airway…

Overview of attention for article published in Respiratory Research, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inhibition of neutrophil elastase attenuates airway hyperresponsiveness and inflammation in a mouse model of secondary allergen challenge: neutrophil elastase inhibition attenuates allergic airway responses
Published in
Respiratory Research, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1465-9921-14-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hikari Koga, Nobuaki Miyahara, Yasuko Fuchimoto, Genyo Ikeda, Koichi Waseda, Katsuichiro Ono, Yasushi Tanimoto, Mikio Kataoka, Erwin W Gelfand, Mitsune Tanimoto, Arihiko Kanehiro

Abstract

Chronic asthma is often associated with neutrophilic infiltration in the airways. Neutrophils contain elastase, a potent secretagogue in the airways, nonetheless the role for neutrophil elastase as well as neutrophilic inflammation in allergen-induced airway responses is not well defined. In this study, we have investigated the impact of neutrophil elastase inhibition on the development of allergic airway inflammation and airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) in previously sensitized and challenged mice.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 51 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 33%
Researcher 6 12%
Professor 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Student > Master 4 8%
Other 11 21%
Unknown 6 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 21%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 7 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2018.
All research outputs
#5,164,332
of 18,796,975 outputs
Outputs from Respiratory Research
#640
of 2,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,382
of 263,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Respiratory Research
#23
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,796,975 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,351 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,305 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.